The issue I'm about to raise has been subject to high-profile debate over a number of years.

And so I pose to you something which is very important to me.

Is tweety a boy or a girl?

A recent survey has shown that around 72% of people believe tweety to be male (you can do the math for female response).

I am part of the the majority in my beliefs, although in the image attached, note the pink nightcap...

Thoughts?

My name is hyperbola...
marvel at my asymptotic behaviour, lust for my limits which approach infinity

you know you are spending too much time in the library when:

The librarian asks "your name is grant isn't it"

add your answers here

To all you guys doing your finals (esp aussies doing their HSC) good luck, and let the slime be with you!

Especially to the ultra bootylicious laura, who i shamefully forgot to wish the best :(

Sorry :(

Im posting this in my updates, because I don't seem to be able to post a discussion...Login issues
***********************************
It seems many people, especially uni students believe the U.S. should have not retaliated in any sense to the events of September 11.

Assuming the U.S. government really does have strong evidence attesting to the guilt of Bin Laden (Don't Doubt that I think they do, I just don't wanna be naive nor a conspiracy theorist - No evidence has been presented to the public) was the military action against the Taliban appropriate?

Or should alternatives have been considered?

Economic Sanctions

Other negotiations

Other Alternatives

Would other approaches have worked? Why?
Should these other approaches have been backed up by the military?

And just as importantly will the current offensive work? Or is the U.S. wasting their resources and sewing the seeds of hatred?

---

I feel the no-retaliation view to be absolutely ridiculous, and don't understand how people can hold it.

Although I believe they would have probably failed, Negotiations with the Taliban should not have been completely ruled out, but the continued hardline military action was probably a necessary pressure to be placed upon them, to force leaders to offer reasonable solutions (ie: The proposal of an unspecified third country was probably unreasonable - Are there any truly neutral countries in this situation? Or would there be an automatic bias?).

Your thoughts?